AAP: “Male circumcision consists of the surgical removal of some, or all, of the foreskin (or prepuce) from the penis. It is one of the most common procedures in the world. [...]Evaluation of current evidence indicates that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks; [...] Male circumcision does not appear to adversely affect penile sexual function/ sensitivity or sexual satisfaction. It is imperative that those providing circumcision are adequately trained and that both sterile techniques and effective pain management are used. Significant acute complications are rare. [...] Parents are entitled to factually correct, nonbiased information about circumcision”
AAP: “The true incidence of complications after newborn circumcision is unknown,
in part due to differing definitions of “complication” and differing standards for determining the timing of when a complication has occurred [...] Significant acute complications are rare, occurring in approximately 1 in 500 newborn male circumcisions.
Acute complications are usually minor and most commonly involve bleeding, infection, or an imperfect amount of tissue removed.[...] Late complications of newborn circumcision
include excessive residual skin (incomplete circumcision), excessive
skin removal … ”
AAP: “Based on the data reviewed, it is difficult, if not impossible, to adequately assess the total impact of complications, because the data are scant and inconsistent regarding the severity of complications. [...] Financial costs of care, emotional tolls, or the need for future corrective surgery (with the attendant anesthetic risks, family stress, and expense) are unknown.”
Activists monitoring social networks often encounter individual cases of complications that usually go unreported, and where evidently medical staff have done as much possible to make parents feel good regardless of the negative outcome. The previous statements mention “excessive skin removal”. While this may not sound very important because, well, “it’s just skin”, truth is penile skin has an important role in sexual life and development. And while parents are not thinking about the future sexual life of their child (except in their desire to conform to a social norm by circumcising), this excessive loss of skin results in dramatic harm to the individuals sexual life.
The skin of the penis is supposed to move during sex. In fact, it is supposed to glide over the glans, something that is almost always destroyed by circumcision. But the skin also has to be able to accommodate a normal erection. In other words, when the erectile tissue inside the penis swells with blood to make the penis enlarge and become stiff, there needs to be enough skin to accommodate its length.
When there is not enough skin, many things can happen. The penis can bend unnaturally when erect. The skin can chafe and even bleed during sex due to friction. The penis may pull surrounding skin (from the scrotum and pubic area) to make for the lack of normal penile skin, resulting in pubic hair climbing up the shaft, and potentially penetrating the individual’s sexual partner, causing bruising and tears inside. Insufficient skin can also cause part of the penis to push inward during erection (because there is nowhere else for the erectile tissue to go) causing pain during erection.
Many men who experience these complications may not seek help because they assume it’s normal, it’s what an erection feels like or looks like.
In fact, the loss of tissue due to circumcision is the reason why American supermarkets and pharmacies devote shelf space to artificial lubricants, so that men who lost too much tissue can masturbate or have sex.
In a bodybuilding forum we found one such case reported by a non-activist individual asking for advice from his peers.
What motivates this post today is a photo found by activists today on Facebook. In that photo, a relative of a newborn reports that the baby finally left the hospital. Bleeding after circumcision was stopped, but infection is still a concern. Too much skin was removed and they are going to let it heal and follow up in two weeks, and they may use skin grafts later on.
This is one of those complications that barely registers with people, one that the media doesn’t care about, one of those stories that will go unreported and unnoticed. It’s just skin. Until one day, 20 or 30 years later, baby is now an adult, and finds himself wondering why he can’t masturbate or have sex without lube. Why his skin chafes and gets sore if he tries to. Why he ends in pain if he does.
Or his girlfriend, wife, etc., wonders why she ends up with pain and burning inside her vagina after intercourse.
Oh, but it was just some extra skin, wasn’t it?
Oh, but the benefits outweigh the risks, don’t they?
I’m disgusted by the comments I see. Nobody should have to refer to a baby as a “trooper” or a “fighter” just because they allowed a doctor to harm the baby.
Notice the relative’s comment: “wish it was over for him or better yet it never happened“. Well, sad to say, but it wouldn’t have happened if it wasn’t for the circumcision. This injury was 100% preventable.
Another person says “somebody needs to answer a question about removing too much skin“. Well, they did. The AAP statement mentions the risk. Most consent forms mention the risk. They just don’t tell you how bad it really is when it happens. So parents assume that removing too much tissue is just a cosmetic problem. Not that it will involve bleeding, risk of infection (weren’t they trying to prevent infections anyway?), pain, additional surgeries… And what they don’t know yet, long term pain. During sex.
Notice the person who says one of her children had the same problem and the nurses told her that it was a “French cut” and “girls loved it“. The moment when the baby’s genitalia becomes sexualized to appease adults. This again proves that American circumcision is mostly a social fetish disguised as medicine, and that doctors and nurses will say anything to make parents feel good.
In fact, Googling “French cut circumcision” reveals that it something different. What is considered a European or French style circumcision is a low and loose circumcision, not one where excessive tissue was removed.
I’ve known many cases of men harmed in this way. Some became activists. Some have been restoring their foreskins for many years to reduce the pain.
I know a mother who had her first 3 children circumcised. She used to think the right circumcision was the one they did on her first born, the one that had a tight circumcision. Until he turned 4-5 and started expressing pain when he has erections. She is now an activist against circumcision, of course, and regrets the harm that came to her child.
Seeing this photo on Facebook today I can only think: Poor hurt baby. My heart breaks for you and all the other babies and the adults they become who were and will be harmed by this mindless unnecessary, risky and damaging surgery.
Is this harm always accidental?
A number of circumcision fetishists tend to favor “high and tight” circumcisions and often fixate on the removal of the frenulum – something which is necessarily sexual harm, given the sexual sensitivity and pleasure caused by an intact frenulum. And American doctors never mention what happens to the frenulum during circumcision – in fact the word “frenulum” is not even present on the AAP Technical Report on circumcision from 2012!
In this video, the makers of a circumcision device explain how to use their device for a tight circumcision with frenulum cauterization. In other words, to cause as much harm as possible!
One can only wonder… Why?
But they won’t answer.